Unlike most editing & proofreading services, we edit for everything: grammar, spelling, punctuation, idea flow, sentence structure, & more get started now. Hateful speech should not be protected as free speech hateful speech should be banned because it is contributing to negative online activity which could cause harm in the long run i believe when you make a point to direct hate towards a group of people, the attacked group should take alarm you are intentionally trying to hurt someone. Banning hate speech actually will probably swell the problem look at europe, even with their laws banning hate speech, there is still more overt intolerance in the continent at the same time, i don't think it should be encouraged hate speech should be allowed but should be strongly stigmatized and discouraged.
Hate speech should be discouraged around the world because of the emotional harm it does in the society amidst groups and humanity. Jeremy waldron, the harm in hate speech, harvard university press, 2012, 292 pp, 2695 first-amendment guarantees of free speech are a cherished part of the american tradition and set us apart from virtually every other country.
The freedom of speech is to protect our right , not to rosy, comfortable speech, but our right to possibly offensive speechand what may be hate speech to one would be just speaking truth to power and that should always be protected. Read the pros and cons of the debate hate speech should be banned in the us. But in a free society, you also have a duty to defend speech to which you may strongly object acts speak louder than words one way to deal effectively with hate speech is to create laws and policies that discourage bad behavior but do not punish bad beliefs.
Consider recent examples from a cato institute survey of over 3,000 americans with university experience: 40 percent would ban a speaker who says men on average are better than women at math, 51 percent would ban claims that all white people are racists, 49 percent would ban statements that christians are backward and brainwashed, 49 percent would ban speech that criticized and disrespected police, and 41 percent would ban speakers who say undocumented immigrants should be deported. As i have argued in dignity and defamation: the visibility of hate (the 2009 holmes lectures at harvard university), hate speech legislation seeks to uphold a public good by protecting the basic dignitary order of society against this kind of attack. Not attempt to define hate speech as hate crimes, or “acts” in two recent hate crime cases, the us supreme court concluded that acts, but not speech, may be regulated by law. It looks like you've lost connection to our server please check your internet connection or reload this page.
Hate speech can have serious consequences for individuals, groups and the whole society it is important to take a stand and show that this cannot be tolerated. People who are the targets of hate speech deserve the protection of society, and not having hate speech legislation only protects the haters on december 8, 2006 at 2:03 am mark “why hate speech should not be tolerated in a free and democratic society.
A society that allows hate speech to go unpunished is one that tolerates discrimination and invites violence decades of hateful anti-abortion rhetoric in the us led to assassinations of providers, because hate speech is a precursor to violence. Should hate speech be discouraged the answer is easy — of course however, in a free society, you also have a duty to defend speech to which you may strongly object  1 an “epithet” is a characterizing word or phrase accompanying or occurring in place of the name of a person or thing.
Acknowledging the important value of hate speech you write “#2 also disregards the accepted view of ninternalization and normalization of opinions and behaviours in society repeated hate speeches, allowing hate speech in public et cetera will cause those opinions and the behaviour that follows to be accepted in the general discourse. The harm of hate speech jeremy waldron, professor of social and political theory at oxford university, argues the case for legislation against hate speech thanks to the strong trust in the radio, media producers could obtain a blind obedience from the civilians and manipulate the audience at their linking, due to their lack in critical.